Comparison of continuous subcritical water extraction and hydrodistillation of marjoram essential oil

Continuous subcritical water extraction (CSWE) and hydrodistillation were compared for the extraction of essential oil from marjoram leaves. Ground marjoram leaves (0.4 g) were subjected to dynamic extraction with water at 50 bar, 150°C and 2 ml/min for 15 min. Hydrodistillation was performed treating 140 g of marjoram leaves with 1000 ml of water for 3 h. When CSWE was used the compounds were removed from the aqueous extract by a single extraction with 5 ml of hexane, detected by gas chromatography–flame ionization detection (GC–FID) and identified by mass spectrometry, electronic impact. The CSWE method is quicker (15 min versus 3 h), provides a more valuable essential oil (with higher amounts of oxygenated compounds and no significant presence of terpenes) and allows substantial savings of costs, in terms both of energy and plant material. The efficiency (in terms of volume of essential oil/1 g of plant) of CSWE is 5.1 times higher than that provided by hydrodistillation. The precision of the overall method (CSWE combined with GC–FID) is good (RSD less than 7.5%) for n=5.