Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Chemical Composition of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity of Amomum cinnamomeum from Vietnam

Sam, Ly N. ; Huong, Le T. ; et al.
In: Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Jg. 57 (2021-05-01), S. 574-577
Online unknown

Chemical Composition of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity of Amomum cinnamomeum from Vietnam 

Published in Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii, No. 3, May–June, 2021, pp. 487–489.

The lack of information on the chemical constituents and biological activity of the volatile and non-volatile extracts of Amomum cinnamomeum Skornick., Luu & H.D.Tran, sp. nov. (Zingiberaceae) attracted our interest, hence we report herein the results of a study on the chemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from the rhizome of A. cinnamomeum.

The compositions and biological activities of essential oils from Amomum plants grown in Vietnam [[1]–[4]] and other parts of the world [[5]–[8]] have been reported previously. The results also indicated that monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were the predominant compounds in the essential oils of a majority of these Amomum plants. In addition, essential oils from these Amomum plants exhibited biological activities, such as antimicrobial [[1], [5]–[8]] and larvicidal activity [[3]], among others. The aim of the present study is to examine the chemical constituents and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from the leaves and rhizomes of A. cinnamomeum grown in Vietnam for the first time and to determine its potential uses. Mature leaves and rhizomes of A. cinnamomeum were collected from Quang Ngai, Nghe An Province, Vietnam, in July 2019. The sample was identified by Dr. D. N. Dai. A voucher specimen, LNS 804, was deposited at the Botany Museum, Nghe An College of Economics, Vietnam. A total of 1 kg of the pulverized sample was used. The essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation, which was carried out in a Clevenger-type distillation unit designed according to an established specification [[9]].

Gas chromatography (GC) was performed on an Agilent Technologies HP 7890 Plus Gas chromatograph equipped with an FID and fitted with an HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm, Agilent Technology). The analytical conditions were as described previously [[2]–[9]]. An Agilent Technologies HP 7890N Plus Chromatograph fitted with capillary an HP-5 MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) and interfaced with a mass spectrometer HP 5973 MSD was used for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) under the same conditions as those used for gas chromatography as described above. The MS conditions were as follows: ionization voltage 70 eV; emission current 40 mA; acquisitions scan mass range of 35–350 amu at a sampling rate of 1.0 scan/s. The identification of constituents from the GC/MS spectra of A. cinnamomeum was performed based on retention indices (RI) determined with reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C4–C40), under identical experimental conditions. The mass spectral (MS) fragmentation patterns were compared with those of other essential oils of known composition [[10]].

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were measured by the microdilution broth susceptibility assay [[11]]. Stock solutions of the oil were prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). Dilution series (214, 213, 212, 211, 210, 29, 27, 25, 23, and 21 μg/mL) were prepared in sterile distilled water inside the micro-test tubes, from which they were transferred separately to 96-well microtiter plates. Bacteria grown in double-strength Mueller–Hinton broth or double-strength tryptic soy broth, and fungi sustained in double-strength Sabouraud dextrose broth, were standardized to 5 × 105 and 1 × 103 CFU/mL, respectively. DMSO was used as a negative control. Streptomycin was used as the antibacterial standard, while nystatin and cycloheximide were used as antifungal standards. All experiments were performed in triplicate. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the MIC values were determined as the lowest concentration of essential oils of A. cinnamomeum that completely inhibited the growth of the microorganisms. The IC50 values were determined as the percentage inhibition of growth of microorganisms based on the turbidity measurement data of an EPOCH2C spectrophotometer (BioTeK Instruments, Inc Highland Park Winooski, VT, USA) and Rawdata computer software (Belgium).

The average yields of the essential oils were 0.12% and 0.19% (v/w, ± 0.01), respectively, for the leaf and rhizome, calculated on a dry weight basis. Fifty-nine compounds each were identified from both oil samples. The major classes of compounds were monoterpene hydrocarbons (46.9 and 31.9%), oxygenated monoterpenes (14.5 and 32.6%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (15.3 and 6.6%), and oxygenated sesquiterpene (16.4 and 25.7%); see Table 1.

TABLE 1. Constituents of Essential Oils from the Leaves and Rhizomes of Amomum cinnamomeum

Compound a

RIb

Leaf

Rhizome

Compound a

RIb

Leaf

Rhizome

Tricyclene

928

0.2

γ-Muurolene

1490

0.9

α-Pinene

939

4.4

2.4

β-Chamigrene

1491

0.4

Camphene

955

0.4

12.3

n-Pentadecane

1499

0.6

Benzaldehyde

964

0.2

Germacrene D

1499

0.6

Sabinene

978

0.4

β-Selinene

1505

2.5

0.6

β-Pinene

984

35.8

1.5

γ-Amorphene

1509

0.5

Myrcene

992

0.4

0.4

α-Selinene

1514

1.1

0.3

n-Octanal

1003

0.2

β-Bisabolene

1518

0.3

α-Phellandrene

1110

0.3

cis-Dihydrogarofuran

1521

0.3

δ-3-Carene

1016

0.2

0.2

γ-Cadinene

1529

0.3

o-Cymene

1029

0.6

1.2

δ-Cadinene

1537

0.5

0.3

Limonene

1034

1.2

3.7

cis-Calamenene

1538

1.0

0.2

β-Phellandrene

1035

1.5

7.4

α-Calacorene

1559

0.2

(Z)-β-Ocimene

1037

0.8

0.3

Elemol

1562

0.5

(E)-β-Ocimene

1048

0.3

0.2

(E)-Nerolidol

1571

0.6

0.2

2-Octenal

1058

0.2

Germacrene B

1577

0.3

2-Nonanone

1091

0.2

10-epi-Dihydrogarofuran

1579

0.5

γ-Terpinene

1063

0.6

Spathulenol

1598

0.9

0.4

Terpinolene

1094

0.9

0.7

Axenol

1599

0.2

Linalool

1101

1.7

0.5

Caryophyllene oxide

1605

5.9

0.9

(E)-4,8-Dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene

1118

0.1

Copaborneol

1625

2.5

Isoborneol

1166

0.3

0.5

Guaiol

1612

4.3

p-Cymen-8-ol

1190

0.1

Rosifoliol

1621

1.6

α-Terpineol

1197

0.1

Humulene oxide II

1632

0.6

1.1

Fenchyl acetate

1228

0.3

13.7

1-epi-Cubenol

1648

0.2

Thymol methyl ether

1238

0.2

γ-Eudesmol

1649

0.4

Carvacrol methyl ether

1248

0.2

Caryophylla-3(15),7(14)-dien-6-ol

1659

0.3

Linalyl acetate

1256

0.2

epi-α-Cadinol

1657

0.6

2-(E)-Decanal

1264

0.5

α-Muurolol

1661

1.1

0.2

(E)-Cinnamaldehyde

1279

11.5

0.7

Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1β-ol

1665

0.2

7.3

Isobornyl acetate

1293

0.2

4.4

α-Cadinol

1673

0.4

Bornyl acetate

1294

0.2

9.7

Neointermedol

1675

0.9

2.1

Terpinene-4-ol-acetate

1306

0.3

Intermedol

1681

0.3

α-Terpinyl acetate

1356

2.2

Bulnesol

1685

4.2

Isocamphanyl acetate

1379

0.4

14-Hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene

1688

0.5

1.3

α-Copaene

1389

4.7

0.5

Cadalene

1692

0.2

β-Copaene

1402

0.1

Zerumbone

1757

0.2

0.2

cis-β-Elemene

1403

0.1

0.4

γ-Bicyclohomofarnesal

1826

0.6

β-Caryophyllene

1438

2.2

0.9

Total

95.1

96.8

γ-Elemene

1443

0.3

Monoterpene hydrocarbons

46.9

31.9

trans-α-Bergamotene

1445

0.2

Oxygenated monoterpenes

14.5

32.6

(E)-Cinnamyl acetate

1449

0.1

0.1

Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons

15.3

6.6

α-Humulene

1471

0.5

0.5

Oxygenated sesquiterpenes

16.4

25.7

9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene

1478

1.0

0.2

Non-terpenes

2.0

aElution order on HP-5MS column; b Retention indices on HP-5MS column; – not identified.

TABLE 2. Antimicrobial Activity of the Leaf and Rhizome Essential Oils of A. cinnamomeum

Microorganism

MIC, μg/mL

IC50, μg/mL

Leaf

Rhizome

Leaf

Rhizome

Enterococcus faecalis ATCC299212

16.0 ± 0.10

32.0 ± 0.00

4.98 ± 0.00

10.34 ± 0.12

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923

16.0 ± 0.00

32.0 ± 0.00

3.78 ± 0.00

15.98 ± 0.11

Bacillus cereus ATCC14579

16.0 ± 0.11

32.0 ± 0.00

5.78 ± 0.00

9.78 ± 0.20

Candida albicans ATCC10231

64.0 ± 0.50

32.0 ± 0.00

28.79 ± 0.00

9.79 ± 0.10

Both the leaf and rhizome oils exhibited no antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli ATCC25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, and Salmonella enterica ATCC13076.

The main constituents of the leaves oil were β-pinene (35.8%), (E)-cinnamaldehyde (11.5%), and caryophyllene oxide (5.9%), while the rhizome oil was dominated by fenchyl acetate (13.7%), camphene (12.3%), bornyl acetate (9.7%), β-phellandrene (7.4%), and eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1β-ol (7.3%). This is the first report on the volatile constituents of A. cinnamomeum. Terpene compounds predominate in the essential oils, as was reported for other Amomum oil samples grown in Vietnam, such as A. rubidium [[1]] A. gagnepainii [[12]], A. repoense [[12]], A. longiligulare [[3]], A. villosum [[4]], A. aculeatum [[4]], A. maximum [[13]], and A. microcarpum [[9]]. However, the identities of these terpene compounds differed from one species to another, thus exhibiting chemical variability in their compositional pattern [[9]].

The leaves oil of A. cinnamomeum displayed antimicrobial activity towards Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 299212 (MIC 16.0 μg/mL), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC 16.0 μg/mL), and Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 (MIC 16.0 μg/mL). The oil also inhibited the growth of Candida albicans ATCC 10231, with MIC of 64.0 μg/mL. The median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) against the tested microbes were evaluated as 4.98, 3.78, 5.78, and 28.79 μg/mL, respectively. However, the rhizome oil exhibited antimicrobial activity against the four microorganisms with MIC value of 32.0 μg/mL, while the IC50 values were estimated to be 10.34, 15.98, 9.78, and 9.79 μg/mL, respectively. The MIC and IC50 provided evidence that the leaf and rhizome oils of A. cinnamomeum showed potent antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis, S. aureus, B. cereus, and C. albicans. Both the leaf and stem oils exhibited no antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli ATCC25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, and Salmonella enterica ATCC13076. Streptomycin displayed antimicrobial activity with MIC values in the range 0.28 to 3.20 μg/mL, while nystatin had an MIC value of 8.0 μg/mL, with cycloheximide showing activity at MIC of 3.20 μg/mL. This is the first report on the antimicrobial activity of essential oil of space A. cinnamomeum. The results in this study are comparable with data obtained on the antimicrobial action of other Amomum essential oil reported in the literature such as A. rubidium [[1]], A. subulatum [[5]], A. cannicarpum [[14]], A. uliginosum [[15]], A. tsao-ko [[7]], and A. kravanh [[16]]. The antimicrobial activities of the essential oil of A. cinnamomeum can be related to its main compounds or some synergy between the major and minor compounds. The present essential oil constituents, such as β-pinene [[6]], caryophyllene oxide [[17]], (E)-cinnamaldehyde [[18]], fenchyl acetate [[19]], and camphene [[19]], were previously reported to have significant broad-spectrum activity.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Project "Investigate the current status and value of "ma-gang" medicinal resources in Quang Ngai Province as a basis for management, use, conservation, and sustainable development" funded by Quang Ngai Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Contract No. 06/2018/HD-DTKHCN, dated 25 July 2018).

References 1 Huong LT, Viet NT, Sam LY, Giang CN, Hung NH, Dai DN, Ogunwande IA. Bol. Latinoame. Caribe Plantas Med. Aromat. 2021; 20: 81. 10.37360/blacpma.21.20.1.7 2 Huong LT, Viet NT, Sam LY, Giang CN, Hung NH, Dai DN, Ogunwande IA. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants. 2020; 23: 405. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXitVGmsLvN. 10.1080/0972060X.2020.1756425 3 Chau LTM, Thang TD, Huong LT, Ogunwande IA. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2015; 51: 1181. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhvVSgt73L. 10.1007/s10600-015-1525-z 4 Huong LT, Chau LTM, Thang TD, Ogunwande IA. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants. 2014; 17: 1352. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjs1OntL8%3D. 10.1080/0972060X.2014.983992 5 Noumi E, Mejdi S, Mousa MA, Punchappady-Devasya R, Kanekar S, Lucia C, Laura DM, Souza LF, Msaada K, Mancini E, Flamini G, Alsieni A, De Feo V. Molecules. 2018; 23: 2818. 10.3390/molecules23112818 6 Satyal P, Dosoky NS, Kincer BL, Setzer WN. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012; 7: 1233. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVKhsLrL. 23074918 7 Guo N, Yu-Ping Z, Qi C, Qing-Yan G, Jiao J, Wei W, Zu YG, Fu YJ. Food Cont. 2017; 75: 236. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFSltrvM. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.013 8 Diao WR, Zhang LL, Feng SS, Xu JG. J. Food Prot. 2014; 77: 1740. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFWgsrjP. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-014 9 Pharmacopoeia V. Medical Publishing House. 2009: Vietnam; Hanoi National Institute of Science and Technology, Chemistry Web Book Data. Data from NIST Standard Reference Database 69 (2011). Sahm DH, Washington JABalows A, Hausler WJ, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD, Shamody HJ. Antibacterial Susceptibility Tests: Dilution Methods. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 1991: Washington, DC, USA; American Society for Microbiology Huong LT, Hung NV, Chung MV, Dai DN, Ogunwande IA. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018; 32: 316. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhtFantbrP. 10.1080/14786419.2017.1346643 Huong LT, Dai DN, Thang TD, Bach TT, Ogunwande IA. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015; 19: 1469. 10.1080/14786419.2014.1003064 Mathew J, Baby S. Varughese, D. Mathew, and S. Sugathan. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006; 18: 35. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhsVehu70%3D. 10.1080/10412905.2006.9699379 Pulbutr P, Caichompoo W, Lertsatitthanakorn P, Phadungkit M, Rattanakiat S. J. Biol. Sci. 2012; 12: 355. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXnslegtL0%3D. 10.3923/jbs.2012.355.360 Abdel Rasoul MA, KhMarei GI, Abdelgaleil SAM. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012; 61: 3667 Sener N, Ozkinali S, Mahmut G, Kerim G, Ozkan OE, Moustafa MK. Ind. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2017; 51: S230. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXmtl2rsbo%3D. 10.5530/ijper.51.3s.19 S. Siddiqua, B. A. Anusha, L. S. Ashwini, and P. S. Negi, J. Food Sci. Technol,52, 5834 (2015); D. F. Firmino, T. T. A. Cavalcante, G. A. Gomes, N. C. S. Firmino, L. D. Rosa, M. G. de Carvalho, and F. E. A. Catunda Jr, Sci. World J., 2018, 1 (2018); A. A. Doyle and J. C. Stephens, Fitoter., 139, 104405 (2019). Swamy MK, Akhtar MS, Sinniah UR. Evidence-Based Complement. Alter. Med. 2016; 2016: 1. 10.1155/2016/3012462

By Le T. Huong; Ly N. Sam; Bui D. Thach; Do N. Dai and Isiaka A. Ogunwande

Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author

Titel:
Chemical Composition of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity of Amomum cinnamomeum from Vietnam
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Sam, Ly N. ; Huong, Le T. ; Dai, Do N. ; Ogunwande, Isiaka A. ; Thach, Bui D.
Link:
Zeitschrift: Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Jg. 57 (2021-05-01), S. 574-577
Veröffentlichung: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
Medientyp: unknown
ISSN: 1573-8388 (print) ; 0009-3130 (print)
DOI: 10.1007/s10600-021-03421-y
Schlagwort:
  • biology
  • Chemistry
  • Plant Science
  • General Chemistry
  • Food science
  • biology.organism_classification
  • Antimicrobial
  • Chemical composition
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Amomum
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: OpenAIRE
  • Rights: CLOSED

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -