Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Constituents of Essential Oil from Vinca major var. variegata and its Antibacterial Activity

Liu, Ruijie ; Wei, Qiang
In: Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Jg. 57 (2021-09-01), S. 965-967
Online unknown

Constituents of Essential Oil from Vinca major var. variegata and its Antibacterial Activity 

Published in Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii, No. 5, September–October, 2021, pp. 823–825.

The genus Vinca is mainly native to Europe, southwest Asia, and northwest Africa [[1]]. Vinca major var. variegata Loudon, belonging to Apocynaceae, is a Mediterranean species hemicryptophyte that is widely distributed in many European countries such as Romania, Austria, and Bulgaria and that grows on walls or cliffs [[2]]. V. major has been planted widely in China as a leaf-colored ornamental and functional plant [[3]]. The genus Vinca usually can be used to extract and isolate indole alkaloids with diverse structures for medicinal research and development [[1]]. There are some reports on the isolation of alkaloids of the leaves of V. major var. variegata, such as reserpinine, majdine, akuammicine, strictosidine lactam, seudoakuammigine, akuammine, 11-hydroxypolyneuridine, vallesiachotamine, isovallesiachotamine, reserpinine, vincamajine, and 10-hydroxycathofoline [[4]]. Majdine has antioxidant, apoptotic, and antiradical effects [[6]], and vallesiachotamine has antiproliferative effects on human melanoma cells [[7]]. The alkaloid extract has high lipid peroxidation inhibitory, DPPH radical scavenging, and anticholinesterase activities [[1]].

In this study, the chemical compositions of the essential oil from V. major var. variegata leaves and stems were investigated for the first time and used to characterize and compare the constituents of both oils.

Hydrodistillation of V. major var. variegata leaves and stems yielded 0.10% and 0.05% (w/w) volatile oil based on dry weight, respectively. A total of 50 compounds of both essential oils was identified according to their retention indices (RI) as shown in the Table 1. Forty-four volatiles, representing 92.9% of the oil content, were observed in the leaves with five main chemical compounds, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol (19.7%), cyclohexanone (17.4%), acetic acid n-octadecyl ester (7.4%), benzeneacetaldehyde (6.6%), and o-xylene (5.9%). Meanwhile, 25 compounds were detected in the stems oil, which represented 91.3% of the total composition, with the principal oil constituents being cyclohexanone (17.2%), 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis (2-methylpropyl) ester (14.6%), (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol (9.5%), acetic acid n-octadecyl ester (6.8%), benzeneacetaldehyde (6.0%), and palmitic acid (5.5%). Additionally, GC-MS analysis for both volatile oils revealed that the major type of volatile oil compounds included alcohols (28.0%, 12.8%), esters (14.6%, 28.0%), ketones (17.5%, 17.2%), benzenes (14.3%, 10.4%), aldehydes (7.2%, 6.0%), cycloalkanes (3.9%, 3.6%), straight-chain alkanes (5.3%, 4.6%), phenols (1.2%, 0.1%), terpenoids (0.7, 0.2%), acids (0, 8.4%), and others (0.2%, 0%) for the leaves and stems. A comparison of the constituents of both oils showed that 18 compounds coexisted in the leaf and stem oils and another 32 different compounds. From the MIC of leaves and stems against various pathogenic and drug-resistant microbes, it was obvious that the leaf oil was more active than the stem oil (Table 2). The leaf oil showed strongest activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus. spp. (MIC 0.16 mg/mL) and weakest activity against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This may contribute to the reason why the presence of numerous antibacterial ingredients cause leakage of various entities such as ions, amino acids, nucleic acids, ATP, etc., leading to a disturbance and increase in membrane permeability [[8]].

TABLE 1. Constituents of V. major var. variegata Leaf and Stem Essential Oils, %

Constituent

LRI

Leaves

Stems

(Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol

838

19.7

9.5

Ethylbenzene

854

2.2

p-Xylene

862

3.8

o-Xylene

862

5.9

Cyclohexanone

881

17.4

17.2

1,2,4-Trimethyl-benzene

978

0.1

Decane

1000

0.1

1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene

1005

0.5

2-Ethyl-1-hexanol

1010

3.2

3.1

1,3-Diethylbenzene

1040

0.2

2.2

1,4-Diethylbenzene

1046

3.4

Benzeneacetaldehyde

1048

6.6

6.0

1,3,8-p-Menthatriene

1085

0.1

1-Ethyl-2,3-dimethylbenzene

1095

0.6

4-Ethenyl-1,2-dimethybenzene

1099

0.2

1,2,4,5-Tertamethylbenzene

1109

1.0

Pentylcyclohexane

1121

0.2

1,2,3,4-Tetramethyl-benzene

1145

0.1

(E,Z)-3,6-Nonadien-1-ol

1156

1.4

1-Methylene-1H-Indene

1166

2.3

2.2

Benzedrex

1170

0.2

Methyl salicylate

1176

1.4

4.0

Dodecane

1200

0.6

(Z)-3,7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol

1215

0.2

(E)-3,7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol

1232

3.5

1,1′-Bicyclohexyl

1304

3.7

3.6

Formic acid, decyl ester

1379

0.1

Tetradecane

1400

0.2

γ-Cadinene

1525

0.4

0.1

2,4-Bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol

1539

1.2

0.1

2.6,10-Trimethyldodecane

1546

0.2

2,6,10-Trimethyltetradecane

1557

0.2

Diethyl phthalate

1578

2.5

2.4

Hexadecane

1600

0.7

1.0

7-Isoprpenyl-1,4α-dimethyl-4,4α,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-3H-naphthalen-2-one

1673

0.1

Benzyl benzoate

1725

1.0

0.2

Octadecane

1800

0.6

1.0

13-Tetradecen-1-ol acetate

1805

1.2

2,6,10,14-Tetramethylhexadecane

1816

1.9

1.3

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl)ester

1819

1.0

14.6

trans-9-Hexadecen-1-ol

1868

0.1

1-Hexadecanol

1882

0.1

Nonadecane

1900

0.7

1.2

Palmitic acid

1959

5.5

Sandracopimara-8(14),15-diene

1998

0.2

0.1

E-15-Heptadecenal

2083

0.6

Linoleic acid

2133

2.9

Acetic acid, n-octadecyl ester

2161

7.4

6.8

Pentacosane

2500

0.1

Heptacosane

2700

0.1

Total

92.9

91.3

LRI: Linear retention index; –: not detected.

TABLE 2. MIC (mg/mL) values of leaf and stem oils of V. major var. variegata

Bacterial strains

Leaves

Stems

Bacterial strains

Leaves

Stems

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

0.62

1.25

Escherichia coli

0.31

1.25

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

0.31

0.62

Proteus. spp.

0.16

0.62

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0.16

1.25

Klebsiella pneumoniae

0.62

2.50

Fresh leaves and stems of V. major var. variegata were harvested in May 2020 from the schoolyard of Anhui Xinhua University (31°83′N, 117°19′E, 55 m above sea level), Hefei, China. The botanical identification of the plants was performed by Prof. Q. Z. Li. A voucher specimen (No. AHXH 122) has been deposited in the laboratory of Anhui Xinhua University. The materials were air-dried at room temperature for 24 h and ground into a powder. Dry leaves and stems (500 mg) were immersed in 3 L of distilled water in a 8 L three-necked flask. The leaf and stem oils were extracted by hydrodistillation for 4 h. Then both essential oils were obtained and kept in a refrigerator for further analysis.

The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis were performed using an Agilent GC 7890A coupled with an Agilent 5975C mass selective detector. The gas chromatograph was equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm). Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flux of 1 mL/min. Samples of 1 μL were injected using split ratio 1:30. The injector temperature was 250°C. The oven temperature was set as follows: initial temperature 40°C for 1 min, ramp of 5°C/min up to 300°C. MS conditions: electron bombardment ionization energy 60 eV. Mass range was from 25 to 550 atomic mass units. Ion source and interface temperature was 220°C. Solvent delay time was 5 min. The sample was dissolved in 10% cyclohexane.

Identification of the volatile oil compounds was based on matching their mass spectra with standard data by comparison of their mass spectra and retention indices (RI) recorded in the NIST-11 library or the National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Chemistry Webbook, SRD69, USA. The MS fragmentation patterns were checked with those of other essential oils of known composition (NIST). The relative contents of the identified compounds in the essential oil were qualified by the method of peak area normalization without taking into account the response factors of individual compounds.

Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of V. major var. variegata was determined using disc diffusion method [[10]]. Strains were obtained from the Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University in Anhui Province of China. The bacterial inocula were made by suspending overnight colonies from Muller–Hinton (MH) agar media in 0.9% saline. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)-soluble essential oils (10% v/v) were dissolved at a concentration of 10 μg/mL and further diluted to 5.00, 2.50, 1.25, 0.62, 0.31, and 0.16 mg/mL. Blank discs containing 20 μL of 10% DMSO were used as controls. Microtiter plates were incubated at 30–35°C for 24 h. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration at which growth was inhibited.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported financially by Natural Science Foundation Project of Anhui Educational Committee (KJ2020A0791).

References 1 Bahadori F, Topcu G, Boga M, Turkekul A, Kolak U, Kartal M. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012; 7; 6: 731. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVehu7vO. 22816294 2 Negrea R, Draghia L, Ciobotari G. Horticulture. 2015; 72; 2: 388 3 Cheng GG, Zhao HY, Liu L, Zhao YL, Song CW, Gu J, Sun WB, Liu YP, Luo XD. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2016; 14; 1: 56. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXitl2rs7nM. 26850347 4 Balsevich J, Constabel F, Kurz W. Planta Med. 1982; 44; 2: 91. 1:CAS:528:DyaL38XitFChu7s%3D. 10.1055/s-2007-971409 5 Hu CQ, Huang P. J. Shanghai First Med. Coll. 1982; 9; 1: 66 6 Gulcin I, Beydemir S, Topal F, Gagua N, Bakuridze A, Bayram R, Gepdiremen A. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Ch. 2012; 27; 4: 587. 10.3109/14756366.2011.604318 7 P. R. O Soares, P. L. D Oliveira, M. A. de O. Cecilia, L. Kato, and A. Guillo, Arch. Pharm. Res., 35 (3), 565 (2012). 8 Lambert R, Skandamis PN, Coote PJ, Nychas GJ. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001; 91; 3: 453. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXmvFKksb0%3D. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01428.x 9 Cox SD, Gustafson JE, Mann CM, Markham JL, Liew YC, Hartland RP, Bell HC, Warmington JR, Wyllie SG. Lett. Microbiol. 1998; 26; 5: 355. 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXks1elsr8%3D. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00348.x Hajimehdipoor H, Samadi N, Mozaffarian V, Rahimifard N, Shoeibi S, Pirali HM. J. Med. Plants. 2010; 9; 6: 39. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtFyqsb%2FP

By Qiang Wei and Ruijie Liu

Reported by Author; Author

Titel:
Constituents of Essential Oil from Vinca major var. variegata and its Antibacterial Activity
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Liu, Ruijie ; Wei, Qiang
Link:
Zeitschrift: Chemistry of Natural Compounds, Jg. 57 (2021-09-01), S. 965-967
Veröffentlichung: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
Medientyp: unknown
ISSN: 1573-8388 (print) ; 0009-3130 (print)
DOI: 10.1007/s10600-021-03525-5
Schlagwort:
  • Traditional medicine
  • biology
  • law
  • Chemistry
  • Plant Science
  • General Chemistry
  • Antibacterial activity
  • Vinca major
  • biology.organism_classification
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Essential oil
  • law.invention
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: OpenAIRE
  • Rights: CLOSED

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -