Published in Khimiya Prirodnykh Soedinenii, No. 5, September–October, 2020, pp. 798–800.
The Caatinga is a semi-arid biome exclusive to Brazil with considerable biodiversity and a biological heritage including 4880 species of flowering plants, 291 of which are endemic to the region [[
The cataplasm under the outer bark and infusions made from the leaves are used in folk medicine due to their healing, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and diuretic properties, as well as for the treatment of rashes and to remove warts [[
The literature reveals several biologic activities for different parts of C. quercifolius. The seed oil of C. quercifolius showed high antioxidant activity [[
Phytochemical studies of the species reveal the occurrence of amino acids, terpenoids [[
To the best of our knowledge, C. quercifolius has not previously been investigated for the identification of the chemical constituents of its essential oils. This paper reports for the first time the chemical composition of essential oils from the leaves, flowers, and bark of C. quercifolius occurring in the Caatinga of Brazil.
The essential oils obtained through conventional hydrodistillation of fresh leaves, flowers, and bark of C. quercifolius had a light yellow color. The yield on a fresh weight basis was 0.01% for leaves, 0.03% for flowers, and 0.01% for bark. The oils were submitted to CG-MS for the determination of the constituents. Thirty-one, thirty, and eighteen compounds were identified in the essential oils from leaves, flowers, and bark, respectively, accounting for 97.3%, 98.5%, and 81.4% of the total oils (Table 1).
Composition of Essential Oil from Leaves, Flowers, and Barks of Cnidoscolus quercifolius, Yield (%) ± SD
Compound RIa Leaves Flowers Bark 929 – 3.3 ± 0.1 – Sabinene 963 – 1.4 ± 0.1 – 978 – 9.6 ± 0.2 – Myrcene* 989 – 6.1 ± 0.1 – Dehydroxy- 995 – 3.1 ± 0.1 – Meta-mentha1-(7),8-diene 999 – 1.8 ± 0.1 – 1000 – 2.4 ± 0.1 – 1002 – 5.0 ± 0.1 – 1004 – 4.0 ± 0.1 – 1005 – 4.4 ± 0.2 – 1009 – 3.6 ± 0.1 – 1,4-Cineole 1012 0.9 ± 0.0 – – 1014 – 1.5 ± 0.1 – Limonene* 1023 – 5.2 ± 0.2 – 1046 0.9 ± 0.1 – – 1057 – 20.5 ± 0.6 – 1119 3.2 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.0 Dihydrolinalool 1131 1.7 ± 0.1 3.3 ± 0.1 – 1134 – 1.9 ± 0.1 – 1139 – 1.7 ± 0.1 – Menthone 1148 4.7 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.0 – 1150 – 1.7 ± 0.1 1154 – 1.1 ± 0.1 – Tetrahydrolavandulol 1157 0.9 ± 0.0 1.8 ± 0.0 – 1186 10.9 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.1 – 1194 0.6 ± 0.0 – – Shisofuran 1198 0.4 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0 – 1200 0.8 ± 0.0 – – Citronellol* 1223 0.4 ± 0.0 – – Thymol* 1289 0.7 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.1 – 1291 0.9 ± 0.0 – – Silphiperfol-4,7(14)-diene 1358 5.9 ± 0.2 – – ( 1361 1.0 ±0.1 0.5 ± 0.0 – 1402 1.4 ± 0.0 – – Sesquithujene 1405 0.4 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.0 – ( 1454 0.5 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.0 – Methyl- 1479 1.0 ± 0.1 – – ( 1487 0.5 ± 0.0 – – Bicyclogermacrene* 1500 1.8 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.0 – 1505 0.6 ± 0.0 – – 1537 2.0 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1 – ( 1561 0.2 ± 0.0 – – Curcumenol 1733 0.3 ± 0.0 – – Vetivenic acid 1811 0.5 ± 0.0 – – Cryptomeridiol 1813 1.1 ± 0.1 – 0.6 ± 0.0 1822 0.5 ± 0.0 – – (8 1889 – – 3.2 ± 0.1 Isopimara-9(11),15-diene 1905 – – 0.9 ± 0.1 11,12-Dihydroxyvalencene 1914 7.8 ± 0.2 – – Beyerene 1931 – – 0.6 ± 0.1 Isohibaene 1933 – – 1.0 ± 0.1 Cembrene 1937 – – 4.7 ± 0.2 Phytol* 1942 42.1 ± 1.1 – – Isophytol 1946 2.5 ± 0.2 – – Palmitic acid 1988 – – 1.9 ± 0.1 13- 2000 – – 0.3 ± 0.0 Polygodial 2016 – – 0.4 ± 0.0 Phyllocladene 2016 – – 3.4 ± 0.2 Manool 2056 – – 6.6 ± 0.3 Abietadiene 2087 – – 21.4 ± 1.3 Linoleic acid 2132 – – 2.4 ± 0.1 Oleic acid 2141 – – 0.7 ± 0.1 Sandaracopimarinal 2184 – – 1.0 ± 0.0 Phyllocladanol 2209 – – 2.4 ± 0.1 Dehydro-abietal 2274 – – 29.9 ± 1.1 Total 97.3 ± 1.3 98.5 ± 0.6 81.4 ± 1.3 Monoterpenes 26.9 ± 0.3 95.5 ± 0.5 0.3 ± 0.0 Sesquiterpenes 25.8 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.1 Diterpenes 44.6 ± 1.1 – 72.5 ± 1.2 Fatty acids – – 5.0 ± 0.1
Diterpene was the predominant class of compounds in the leaf (44.6%) and bark (72.5%) oils, whereas monoterpenes predominated in the flower oil (95.5%). The major constituents identified in the leaf oil were phytol (42.1%), α-terpineol (10.9%), and 11,12-dihydroxyvalencene (7.8%). The major constituents identified in the flower oil were γ-terpinene (20.5%) and β-pinene (9.6%). The diterpenes dehydroabietal (29.9%) and abietadiene (21.4%) were the major constituents identified in the bark oil. These results suggest the chemical variability among the essentials oils from different organs of C. quercifolius.
Fresh leaves, flowers, and bark of C. quercifolius were collected from the municipality of Patos in the state of Paraiba (Brazil) in the morning in September 2017 from an adult specimen in an area of the Caatinga under human pressure.
The plant was identified by botanist Dr. Maria de Fatima de Araujo Lucena of the Centro de Saude e Tecnologia Rural [Center for Health and Rural Technology] of the Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG). A voucher sample of the species was mounted and deposited in the herbarium of the UFCG Centro de Saude e Tecnologia Rural under No. 6786. The extraction of the essential oil through conventional hydrodistillation of the fresh leaves was performed as described previously by Moraes et al. (2012) [[
By A. S. Alves; M. M. de Moraes; C. A. G. da Camara and M. F. A. Lucena
Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author