| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- Language: English
- [Obstet Gynecol] 2022 Nov 01; Vol. 140 (5), pp. 729-737. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Aug 10.
- MeSH Terms: Abortion, Induced* ; Medicine* ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Female ; United States ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Health Services Accessibility ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Abortion, Legal
- Comments: Comment in: Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb 1;141(2):419-420. (PMID: 36657146)
- References: Supreme Court of the United States. Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al. v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization et al., No. 19–1391. Accessed June 24, 2022. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf. ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Abortion is essential health care. Accessed May 25, 2022. https://www.acog.org/advocacy/abortion-is-essential. ; Harris LH, Cooper A, Rasinski KA, Curlin FA, Lyerly AD. Obstetrician-gynecologists' objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:905–12. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f12b7. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f12b7) ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Understanding ACOG’s policy on abortion. Accessed July 2, 2022. https://www.acog.org/news/news-articles/2022/05/understanding-acog-policy-on-abortion. ; Grossman D, Grindlay K, Altshuler AL, Schulkin J. Induced abortion provision among a national sample of obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:477–83. doi: doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003110. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003110) ; Stulberg DB, Dude AM, Dahlquist I, Curlin FA. Abortion provision among practicing obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:609–14. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad973. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad973) ; Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:3–14. doi:10.1363/46e0414. (PMID: 10.1363/46e0414) ; Guttmacher Institute. Medicaid coverage of abortion. Accessed June 16, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you-can-use/medicaid-coverage-abortion. ; Anderson EM, Cowan SK, Higgins JA, Schmuhl NB, Wautlet CK. Willing but unable: physicians' referral knowledge as barriers to abortion care. SSM Popul Health 2022;17:101002. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101002) ; Bartlett LA, Berg CJ, Shulman HB, Zane SB, Green CA, Whitehead S, et al. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:729–37. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000116260.81570.60. (PMID: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116260.81570.60) ; Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception 2006;74:334–44. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.04.010) ; Kiley JW, Yee LM, Niemi CM, Feinglass JM, Simon MA. Delays in request for pregnancy termination: comparison of patients in the first and second trimesters. Contraception 2010;81:446–51. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.021. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.021) ; Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health 2013;104:1687–94. doi:10.2105/AJPH. (PMID: 10.2105/AJPH) ; Foster DG. The Turnaway Study: the cost of denying women access to abortion. Scribner; 2020. ; Stevenson AJ. The pregnancy-related mortality impact of a total abortion ban in the United States: a research note on increased deaths due to remaining pregnant. Demography 2021;58:2019–28. doi:10.1215/00703370-9585908. (PMID: 10.1215/00703370-9585908) ; Perrucci A. Decision assessment and counseling in abortion care: philosophy and practice. 1st ed. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2012. ; Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. The framework: counseling for patient-centered abortion care. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://www.innovating-education.org/2018/09/the-patient-has-the-answer-pregnancy-options-counseling-workshop/. ; Abortion Freedom Partnership. Reprocare. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://reprocare.com/. ; All-Options. Pregnancy, parenting, abortion, adoption. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://www.all-options.org/. ; Exhale. Pro-voice. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://exhaleprovoice.org/. ; Leeman L, Asaria S, Espey E, Ogburn J, Gopman S, Barnett S. Can mifepristone medication abortion be successfully integrated into medical practices that do not offer surgical abortion? Contraception 2007;76:96–100. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.007) ; Bartz D, Blumenthal P. First-trimester pregnancy termination: medication abortion. In: UpToDate. Wolters Kluwer; 2022. ; Medication abortion up to 70 days of gestation. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 225. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;136:e31–47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004082. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004082) ; Raymond EG, Grossman D, Mark A, Upadhyay UD, Dean G, Creinin MD, et al. Commentary: no-test medication abortion: a sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond. Contraception 2020;101:361–6. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.005) ; U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Mifeprex (mifepristone) information. Accessed May 28, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/mifeprex-mifepristone-information. ; Upadhyay UD, Raymond EG, Koenig LR, Coplon L, Gold M, Kaneshiro B, et al. Outcomes and safety of history-based screening for medication abortion: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2022;182:482–91. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0217. (PMID: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0217) ; Kerestes C, Murayama S, Tyson J, Natavio M, Seamon E, Raidoo S, et al. Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: practical experience with multiple care delivery models. Contraception 2021;104:49–53. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025) ; Schreiber CA, Creinin MD, Atrio J, Sonalkar S, Ratcliffe SJ, Barnhart KT. Mifepristone pretreatment for the medical management of early pregnancy loss. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2161–70. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1715726. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715726) ; Srinivasulu S, Yavari R, Brubaker L, Riker L, Prine L, Rubin SE. US clinicians' perspectives on how mifepristone regulations affect access to medication abortion and early pregnancy loss care in primary care. Contraception 2021;104:92–7. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.017) ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Improving access to mifepristone for reproductive health indications. Accessed July 3, 2022. https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/position-statements/2018/improving-access-to-mifepristone-for-reproductive-health-indications. ; U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). Mifepristone shared system REMS. Mifepristone shared system REMS. Accessed May 24, 2022 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/rems/index.cfm?event=RemsDetails.page&REMS=390. ; Mifeprex REMS Study Group. Sixteen years of overregulation: time to unburden Mifeprex. N Engl J Med 2017;376:790–4. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1612526. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMsb1612526) ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Understanding the practical implications of the FDA's December 2021 mifepristone REMS decision: a Q&A with Dr. Nisha Verma and Vanessa Wellbery. Accessed May 24, 2022. https://www.acog.org/news/news-articles/2022/03/understanding-the-practical-implications-of-the-fdas-december-2021-mifepristone-rems-decision. ; Allen RH, Goldberg AB. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). Contraception 2016;93:277–91. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.001) ; Kortsmit K, Mandel M, Reeves J, Clark E, Pagano HP, Nguyen A, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ 2021;70:1–29. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1. (PMID: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1) ; Dalton V, Harris L, Weisman C, Guire K, Castleman L, Lebovic D. Patient preferences, satisfaction, and resource use in office evacuation of early pregnancy failure. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:103–10. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000223206.64144.68. (PMID: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223206.64144.68) ; Edwards S, Tureck R, Fredrick M, Huang X, Zhang J, Barnhart K. Patient acceptability of manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy loss. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007;16:1429–36. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0362. (PMID: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0362) ; Dodge LE, Hofler LG, Hacker MR, Haider S. Patient satisfaction and wait times following outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared to electric vacuum aspiration in the operating room: a cross-sectional study. Contracept Reprod Med 2017;2:18. doi:10.1186/s40834-017-0045-6. (PMID: 10.1186/s40834-017-0045-6) ; The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1203–8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291561.48203.27. (PMID: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291561.48203.27) ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. How to talk about abortion. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://www.acog.org/advocacy/abortion-is-essential/come-prepared. ; Physicians for Reproductive Health. Resources for journalists reporting on abortion. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://prh.org/reporterresource/. ; American Civil Liberties Union. Your mini guide to discussing abortion rights at the dinner table. Accessed June 18, 2022. https://aclu-or.org/en/news/your-mini-guide-discussing-abortion-rights-dinner-table. ; if/when/how: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice. Fulfilling Roe’s promise: 2019 update. Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.ifwhenhow.org/download/?key=HMCEbeY0e3ZvskAaKDHFFBODe2M8y2iN0UqE8qvnWqAcZRmyO6OjKjzbiFWEPExA. ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Decriminalization of self-induced abortion. Accessed June 6, 2022. https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/policy-and-position-statements/position-statements/2017/decriminalization-of-self-induced-abortion. ; American Medical Association House of Delegates (A-22). Report of Reference Committee on amendments to constitution and bylaws. Resolution 028—preserving access to reproductive health services. American Medical Association; 2022. ; World Health Organization. Abortion care guideline. Accessed May 25, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1394380/retrieve. ; if/when/how: Lawyering for Reproductive Justice. Self managed abortion: know your rights, if/when/how. Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.reprolegalhelpline.org/sma-know-your-rights/. ; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HIPAA privacy rule and disclosures of information relating to reproductive health care. Accessed June 29, 2022. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/phi-reproductive-health/index.html. ; Roberts D. Killing the Black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. 2nd ed. Vintage; 2017. ; Boodman E. In a doctor's suspicion after a miscarriage, a glimpse of expanding medical mistrust. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.statnews.com/2022/06/29/doctor-suspicion-after-miscarriage-glimpse-of-expanding-medical-mistrust/. ; Raymond EG, Grimes DA. The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:215–9. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923) ; Society of Family Planning. A safe abortion that works for you. Accessed May 26, 2022. https://societyfp.org/safeabortionthatworksforyou/. ; Briozzo L, Vidiella G, Rodriguez F, Gorgoroso M, Faundes A, Pons JE. A risk reduction strategy to prevent maternal deaths associated with unsafe abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95:221–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.013) ; Harris LH, Grossman D. Complications of unsafe and self-managed abortion. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1029–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1908412. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMra1908412) ; Grossman D, Baum SE, Andjelic D, Tatum C, Torres G, Fuentes L, et al. A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: a cohort study. PLoS One 2018:13e0189195. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189195. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189195) ; Ipas. Woman-centered, comprehensive abortion care reference manual. 2nd ed. Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.ipas.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ACREFE16-WomenCenteredCACReferenceManual.pdf. ; Provide. Accessed June 19, 2022. https://providecare.org/. ; Storey A, White K, Treder K, Woodhams E, Bell S, Cannon R. First-trimester abortion complications: simulation cases for OB/GYN residents in sepsis and hemorrhage. MedEdPORTAL 2020;16:10995. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10995. (PMID: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10995) ; Guttmacher Institute. State policies on abortion. Accessed May 24, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/united-states/abortion/state-policies-abortion. ; Higgins J, Schmuhl N, Wautlet C, Rice L. The importance of physician concern and expertise in increasing abortion health care access in local context. Am J Public Health 2020;111:33–6. doi:10.2105/AJPH. (PMID: 10.2105/AJPH) ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Questions to help hospital systems prepare for the widespread and devastating impacts of a post-Roe legal landscape. Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.acog.org/news/news-articles/2022/06/questions-to-help-hospital-systems-prepare-for-the-widespread-and-devastating-impacts-of-a-post-roe-legal-landscape. ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Joint statement: collective action addressing racism. Accessed June 19, 2022. https://www.acog.org/news/news-articles/2020/08/joint-statement-obstetrics-and-gynecology-collective-action-addressing-racism. ; Jerman J, Jones R, Onda T. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014. ; SisterSong: Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective. Reproductive justice. Accessed May 24, 2022. https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice. ; National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.latinainstitute.org/. ; Black Women's Health Imperative. Eliminating barriers to wellness for Black women and girls. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://bwhi.org/.
- Grant Information: K12 HD103096 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20220810 Date Completed: 20221024 Latest Revision: 20230204
- Update Code: 20231215
- PubMed Central ID: PMC9575566
|
