Abstract: Background: Hypertension is associated with endothelial cell dysfunction. E‐selectin, an endothelial cell adhesion molecule, is specific for endothelial cell activation. Polymorphism in E‐selectin gene has recently been identified among which Leu554Phe E‐selectin gene polymorphism is least investigated in essential hypertension. This study reports the association of E‐selectin gene Leu554Phe polymorphism and the expression of E‐selectin gene in patients with essential hypertension. Materials and methods: We analysed the Leu554Phe polymorphism and expression of E‐selectin gene in 250 patients with essential hypertension and 250 normal healthy controls. Genotyping of Leu554Phe polymorphism was performed by polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP), and the expression of E‐selectin gene at mRNA and protein levels were carried out by real‐time PCR and Western blot, respectively. Results: A significant association of E‐selectin genotypes (CT + TT) with essential hypertension (P < .0001, Odds ratio = 2.2 [1.58‐3.24] at 95% CI) was observed. The expression of mRNA for E‐selectin gene in patients with essential hypertension was ~12‐fold higher as compared to control. We observed an elevated level of E‐selectin protein expression (up to 1.9 times) in patients as compared to controls. Conclusions: A significant association of E‐selectin (Leu554Phe) gene and increased expression of E‐selectin gene at mRNA and protein levels in patients might be related to the genetic predisposition to develop essential hypertension.
E‐selectin gene; essential hypertension; gene expression; single nucleotide polymorphism
Essential hypertension is a major health problem in developed as well as developing countries.[
Sample size (250 patients and 250 controls) is adequate for this study determined using standard statistical method in case‐control group, at the significance level of 0.05 at power 80% on the basis of prevalence of minor alleles referred from previous studies.[
Blood pressure measurements were taken according to Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC‐VII) criteria. Patient had been seated on a chair with their feet on the floor, and their arms supported at heart level for 10 minutes. The definition of essential hypertension is as follows: 140 ≤ SBP ≤ 179 mm Hg, 90 ≤ DBP ≤ 109 mm Hg; healthy controls SBP < 130 mm Hg and DBP < 85 mm Hg. All hypertensive patients were diagnosed as having essential hypertension and not receiving any antihypertensive therapy. Patients were not suffering from any infectious disease, inflammatory disease, immunological disorder, secondary hypertension, diabetes and renal disorder. All the study subjects were interviewed using a standard questionnaire with regard to their age, education, lifestyle, food intake, smoking habits and alcohol consumption. Participants who smoked at least one cigarette per day at the time of the recruitment for this study were classified as smokers. For heavy smokers, daily numbers of cigarettes smoked were greater than or equal to 15 cigarettes per day.[
Fasting (12 hours) venous blood samples (5 mL) were obtained from all subjects in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid vial. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Flexigene DNA kit (QIAGEN Inc, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Genotyping of the polymorphism Leu554Phe (C1839T) of E‐selectin gene (rs5355) was identified using polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism techniques. The primers were designed using Generunner version 3.05 software (Hastings Software Inc., Hastings, NY, USA) based on gene bank sequence (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_000001.10). The reliability of our genotyping was confirmed by direct sequencing of amplified DNA from randomly selected samples (20%) in both the study subjects, with no difference observed in results between the two methods. To estimate the assay error rate, 20% of the sample were randomly selected and included as duplicates in genotyping run. PCR amplification conditions were standardized for the above‐mentioned polymorphisms.
For gene polymorphism study, the sequence of the primers used was forward primer 5′‐CTCCCTCCTGACATTAGC‐3′ and that of reverse primer was 5′‐GAAACACTTCCCACACTGA‐3′. The amplified PCR product of 236 bp was digested with BsaXI restriction enzyme. The digestion product was separated on 2.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized directly by UV illumination. Digestion of the PCR products yielded bands of 197 and 39 bp in homozygous wild‐type (CC), 236 bp in homozygous rare (TT), and the three bands (
Total RNA was isolated using RNA isolation kit QIAGEN Inc in blood samples from the study subjects.
RNA obtained was reverse‐transcribed using the Fermentas first‐strand cDNA kit (Reverse Transcription). Real‐time quantitative PCR analysis for E‐selectin gene was performed using the following primers: Forward primer: 5′‐CAACACCCATCACCACTTCAATAG‐3′ and reverse primer: 5′‐CAGCGAGCAAGGGAGAGTTAGA‐3′. Housekeeping genes 18S rRNA was used as an internal control and the primer pair was as follows: forward primer 5′‐GTGGTGTTGAGGAAAGCAGACA‐3′ and reverse primer 5′‐TGATCACACGTTCCACCTCATC‐3′ with SYBR green PCR Core reagents.[
Total protein was isolated from plasma by acetone precipitation method and estimated using bicinchoninic acid protein estimation kit (Bangalore Genei, Bengaluru, India). The human E‐selectin protein (115 kDa) expression was performed by Western blot technique using E‐selectin primary antibody (1:500 dilution; sc‐14011; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) and horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000 dilutions; sc‐2357, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) according to described procedures,[
The sample size was calculated using PS‐Power (Dept. of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA) and sample size calculation version 3.0 software, with an α error of 5% and a power 80% and was found to be adequate in both the study subjects. Statistical analyses were performed with commercial software (STATA, version 12.1, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD. Chi‐square goodness of fit was used to verify the agreement of observed genotype frequencies with those expected (Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium). The analysis of variance was used to calculate the difference between genotype groups using Bonferroni's method for multiple comparisons between genotype classes. An odds ratio at 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated as an index of the association of the genes with essential hypertension.
The baseline characteristics of patients with essential hypertension (N = 250) and normal healthy controls (N = 250) are listed in Table . No statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics were observed between patients and controls. There was nonsignificant difference between number of male and female in the study subjects. Systolic blood pressures (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) in patients were significantly higher than that of controls. The numbers of alcohol users and smokers for hypertension were slightly higher in patients as compared to controls.
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
Parameters Patients (N = 250) Controls (N = 250) P‐value 1. Sex (M/F) 158/92 162/88 2. Age (years) 50.8 ± 14.6 52.7 ± 9.3 .11 3. BMI (kg/m2) 19.4 ± 3.5 18.9 ± 3.2 .09 4. Smoking, heavy (n) 22 20 .9 5. Alcohol consumption (n) 36 33 .78 6. Heart rate (beats/min) 73.8 ± 8.6 72.9 ± 6.7 .19 7. Blood glucose (mg/dL) 94.7 ± 13.6 93.8 ± 15.3 .48 8. Blood urea (mg/dL) 21.2 ± 3.6 20.9 ± 3.9 .37 9. Serum creatinine 0.95 ± 0.28 0.94 ± 0.22 .65 10. Plasma CRP (ng/mL) 34.2 ± 3.2 33.8 ± 2.8 .13 11. LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 90.5 ± 22.6 93.3 ± 24.4 .18 12. HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 42.7 ± 6.9 41.8 ± 7.1 .15 13. Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 158.4 ± 36.3 162.2 ± 38.7 .26 14. Triglyceride (mg/dL) 163.2 ± 33.4 164.9 ± 36.5 .58 15. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) mm Hg 152.0 ± 11.3 120.0 ± 4.2 .0001 16. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) mm Hg 95.3 ± 9.6 81.2 ± 3.3 .0001
- 2 BMI, body mass index; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein.
- 3 The patient group was compared with the control group with t test of significance or by chi‐square test.
- 4 P < .05 is considered to be significant.
The genotypes and alleles of E‐selectin (Leu554Phe) gene polymorphism were in accordance with the Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium in both the patient (χ
Genotype and allele frequencies of Leu554Phe variant of the E‐selectin gene
Subjects Genotypes, n (%) Adjusted odds ratio at 95% confidence intervals for genotypes CC (%) CT (%) TT (%) Subjects Allele frequency Adjusted odds ratio at 95% confidence intervals for alleles C T Controls (n = 250) 160 (64) 85 (34) 5 (2) CC vs CT = 1.96 [1.36‐2.85] P = .0003 CC vs TT = 7.27 [2.7‐19.58] P = .0001 CC vs CT + TT = 2.26 [1.58‐3.24] P < .0001 Patients (n = 250) 110 (44) 115 (46) 25 (10) Controls 0.81 0.19 C vs T = 2.1 [1.57‐2.80] P < .0001 Patients 0.67 0.33
- 5 The patient group was compared with control group with chi‐square (χ2) test at one degree of freedom with odds ratio adjusted for age and sex in both genotypes and alleles.
- 6 P < .05 is considered to be significant.
We observed a significant (P = .0001) intergenotypic variation in the SBP in patients with CC, CT and TT genotypes. Statistically significant results were found between the genotypes and SBP when compared with CC vs CT (P = .0003), CC vs TT (P = .0001) and CT vs TT (P = .004), respectively. The intergenotypic variation in the DBP was not significantly (P = .16) different in patients with CC, CT and TT genotypes (Table ).
Intergenotypic (Leu554Phe variant of the E‐selectin gene) variations in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension
Blood pressure (mm Hg) Average blood pressure values in E‐selectin (Leu554Phe) genotypes P‐value CC CT TT Comparison of genotypes P‐value SBP DBP SBP 142.8 ± 26.8 156.3 ± 28.4 168.8 ± 24.5 .0001 DBP 92.32 ± 13.8 93.5 ± 16.3 96.62 ± 17.2 .16 CC vs CT .0003 .56 CC vs TT .0001 .18 CT vs TT .04 .39
- 7 SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure was compared with respect to genotypes with t test of significance at one degree of freedom adjusted for age and sex.
- 8 Analysis of variance using Bonferroni's method for multiple comparisons between genotype classes.
- 9 P < .05 is considered to be significant.
We observed a statistically significant difference (P < .001) in the average delta‐CT value between the patient (3.9 ± 1.3) and control groups (7.52 ± 1.5). The delta‐delta‐CT value for patients was found to be −3.6. The relative expression of mRNA for E‐selectin gene to 18S rRNA in patients with essential hypertension was ~12‐fold higher as compared to control (Table ).
Fold change expression in quantitative PCR in Leu554Phe variant of the E‐selectin gene
Subjects Average delta‐CT Delta‐delta‐CT Fold difference Patients (N = 250) 3.9 ± 1.3 −3.6 12.2 Controls (N = 250) 7.52 ± 1.5 0 1
- 10 CT, threshold cycle; data are means ± SD.
- 11 18S rRNA gene expression of the same samples was used for calculations.
- 12 P = .0001.
We observed a significant (P = .0001) intergenotypic variation in gene expression (delta‐CT values) in patients with CC, CT and TT genotypes. There were statistically significant results found between the genotypes and average delta‐CT value when compared with CC vs CT (P = .001), CC vs TT (P = .001) and CC vs CT + TT (P = .001), respectively. The intergenotypic variation in gene expression (delta‐CT values) was not significantly (P = .60) differed in controls with CC, CT and TT genotypes (Table ).
Intergenotypic (Leu554Phe variant of the E‐selectin gene) variations in gene expression (delta‐CT values) in study subjects
Subjects Average delta‐CT values in Leu554Phe variant of the E‐selectin genotypes P‐values CC CT TT Comparison of genotypes P‐values Patients Control Patients (N = 250) 4.78 ± 0.94 3.38 ± 1.0 2.17 ± 0.48 .0001 Controls (N = 250) 7.43 ± 1.67 7.66 ± 1.37 7.33 ± 1.2 .60 CC vs CT .001 .54 CC vs TT .001 .89 CC vs CT + TT .001 .76
- 13 Patients and controls were compared with respect to genotypes with t test of significance at one degree of freedom adjusted for age and sex.
- 14 Analysis of variance using Bonferroni's method for comparison of intergenotypic levels of delta‐CT values in patient group.
- 15 P < .05 is considered to be significant.
Figure shows representative Western blots of plasma E‐selectin protein in patients with essential hypertension and controls. The expression of E‐selectin protein was significantly 1.9 times higher in the patient (1.37 ± 0.18) group as compared to controls (0.72 ± 0.12) (P = .0001). Expression of β‐actin protein was used as an internal control for the Western blot analysis.
E‐selectin is not detected in inactivated endothelial cells but is rapidly synthesized in response to certain cytokines and other pro‐inflammatory stimuli, making an activated endothelial marker.[
Epidemiological studies have shown that E‐selectin (Leu554Phe) gene polymorphism may be associated with essential hypertension, but the results are conflicting in different ethnic populations. Several findings have indicated that polymorphisms in genes that encode adhesion molecules may be associated with high risk of essential hypertension.[
In the present study, analysis of the expression of the E‐selectin also showed a significant difference in the average delta‐CT value of E‐selectin gene expression between patients and controls. We found approximately 12‐fold upregulation of E‐selectin gene expression in patients with essential hypertension as compared to controls.
Importantly, the expression of E‐selectin gene was higher in patients with TT genotypes as compared to TC and CC. However, this trend was not observed in the control group. This further strengthens the fact that increased expression of E‐selectin is associated with essential hypertension. We also observed a significant increase (P = .0001) in the expression of E‐selectin gene at protein level in a meaningful number of patients with essential hypertension as compared to similar age‐ and sex‐matched controls. The E‐selectin protein levels were increased up to 1.9 times in patients compared to the control group which are well supported by the studies indicating the role of circulating E‐selectin levels in the regulation of blood pressure.[
Our study shows a significant association of E‐selectin (Leu554Phe) gene with essential hypertension, which is a major risk factor for coronary artery diseases and strokes. An increased expression of E‐selectin gene at mRNA and protein levels was also observed in patients with essential hypertension. Our observations are exploratory; an extended sample‐sized patient follow‐up study is warranted to ascertain E‐selectin gene expression as independent risk factor, and it can serve as prognostic marker for essential hypertension. The present study would be a lead in the development of new approaches for predicting the progression of hypertension and novel therapeutic strategies for its effective management.
No assistance in the preparation of this article is to be declared.
The authors have no potential conflict of interests to declare.
No relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
KS conceived and designed the experiments and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. KS and SC performed the experiments. KS, SC, DS, RN and JB analysed the data. KS, SC, DS and RN wrote the manuscript. RN performed screening and recruitment of study subjects. JB performed sample collection.
PHOTO (COLOR): E‐selectin protein expression in study subjects. Figure 1 represents the Western blots of E‐selectin and β‐actin protein in control group and patient group, respectively
By Kamna Srivastava; Sudhir Chandra; Rajiv Narang; Jagriti Bhatia and Daman Saluja